America.co emblemAmerica.co

Public money / Reform dossier

Reduce payment errors without harming access.

Can we prevent avoidable payment errors while protecting legitimate recipients?

Official oversight finding + proposed evaluation design

The short answer

Improve the particular control that causes an error, check whether it actually works, and track burdens on legitimate recipients. Report estimated errors, verified recoveries, and prevented losses separately.

What the evidence establishes

GAO-26-108694, published April 27, 2026, reports about $186 billion in estimated FY 2025 improper payments across 64 programs at 15 agencies. About $153 billion was overpayments. GAO says the estimate does not cover the entire government-wide problem, and changes in reporting affect year-to-year comparison.

GAO-26-108694 — FY 2025 payment integrity ↗

What it does not establish

Improper payment is not synonymous with fraud. The estimate is not a recoverable cash balance, a criminal finding, or a promised source of funding for America.co projects. A dollar estimated as erroneous is not automatically a dollar recovered.

Original design / proposed

How it could work

Choose one program and one documented error category. Describe the proposed control, its data inputs, the responsible office, and the review process. Use an existing oversight recommendation as a starting question—not evidence that your implementation has succeeded.

Measure false positives alongside errors caught. Provide a route to correct mistaken records and appeal adverse decisions. Report verified recoveries net of administrative costs separately from modeled prevention estimates, using consistent periods and definitions.

Tradeoffs & safeguards

More checks can delay benefits, increase paperwork, or exclude eligible people. Data matching may improve detection while introducing privacy, accuracy, and security risks. Controls need both an effectiveness test and an access test.

Changes in reporting coverage, eligibility rules, or documentation standards can alter an error estimate. A lower reported rate may not mean a better program. Publish the denominator and explain any method change before presenting a trend as progress.

A pilot you could actually evaluate

Proposed evaluation: test one documented control in an authorized program setting with an agreed comparison, independent review, and an appeals pathway. America.co is not conducting that operational pilot or claiming access to private benefit records.

Suggested measures—not reported results

  • Verified erroneous payments in a consistent sampled population
  • False positives, corrected decisions, and processing delays
  • Verified recoveries less implementation and recovery costs
Follow official public-money records ↗
Your next piece of useful work

Build an evaluation brief

Optional. Keep the unknowns visible. This is saved nowhere automatically and is not submitted to America.co or government.

Blank worksheet ↓

Questions worth asking

Is the $186 billion all fraud?

No. It is an estimated improper-payment total reported by GAO, not an estimate of proven fraud.

Can recovered money be promised to new projects?

Not on this basis. Recovery, legal authority, and any appropriation or allocation decision are separate matters. No funding entitlement is offered here.

Go to the original sources

AI-assisted synthesis and original evaluation questions, with linked source checks. No independent expert review, legal conclusion, funding commitment, or proven pilot outcome is claimed. People, methods, and corrections.